Acid · Mandelic Acid
Mandelic acid: it tied with salicylic acid — and then split by which kind of lesion
A 50-person randomised trial compared a 45% mandelic acid peel against a 30% salicylic acid peel over 12 weeks. Overall acne score improvement did not differ, but salicylic acid did better on non-inflammatory lesions and mandelic acid on inflammatory ones. And adverse effects were fewer with mandelic acid. But nothing was left untreated.
Last checked Sep 21, 2026
Start here
- What it is
An alpha hydroxy acid derived from almonds. The largest molecule in its family.
- What it is used for
Toners and serums sold for exfoliation, acne and pigment, and peels in clinics.
- How it is said to work
It is said to loosen the bonds holding skin cells together so they shed. Being a large molecule, it is described as going in slowly and shallowly.
There are no numbers and no citations in this box. What has been established, and how far, is below.
At a glance
- In pregnancy
- Not established
- Irritation
- Low
- Daytime use
- ! Sunscreen required
- How well established
- Early research
- Concentration studied
- 45%
- Length of the studies
- 12 weeks
Not a measurement — reported irritation grouped into five steps. It varies between people. This ingredient makes skin more sensitive to UV.
“Concentration studied” and “Length of the studies” are taken straight from the research on this page. They are not a recommended dose, and the figure for each finding is written out in the text.
This is not how large the effect is but how well confirmed it is. It shows the highest grade among the findings on this page.
Mandelic acid is an alpha hydroxy acid derived from almonds. This site already has pages for glycolic acid, lactic acid and gluconolactone; mandelic acid was the gap in that family.
What sets it apart within the family is molecular size. It is the largest of the AHAs. Larger is said to mean slower and shallower, and so the claim of being gentler travels with it. The adverse-effect result below does not contradict that account.
But there is a large hole in the evidence on this page: nothing was left untreated.
What we found pits a mandelic acid peel against a salicylic acid peel. It is the problem set out on the PRP page — 'both improved' cannot separate both worked from neither did much.
Two questions this trial can answer, though. 'Which of the two acids does better on which lesions' and 'which is less unpleasant'. Because they were matched head to head under the same conditions. We give each its own entry below.
Contents
What is established
The same ingredient at a different strength, in a different formula, is a different product. These are the conditions the studies used.
The overall score tied, and then split by lesion type
A 2020 trial in Rohtak, India.
50 patients with mild-to-moderate facial acne were randomised into two groups.
- 30% salicylic acid peel
- 45% mandelic acid peel
Six sessions at two-week intervals, over 12 weeks. Assessment used the Michaelsson acne score (MAS) and clinical photographs.
Results:
- Overall the two peels were about equally effective. Neither MAS improvement nor percentage decrease in MAS differed significantly between the groups.
- But split by lesion type they diverged — salicylic acid did better on non-inflammatory lesions (comedones) and mandelic acid on inflammatory ones.
The authors write that mandelic acid is emerging as a peeling agent because of antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, which makes comparing it with long-established salicylic acid worthwhile. The split above runs with that account.
How to read it.
First, nothing was left untreated. So this trial cannot say 'a mandelic acid peel reduces acne'. It says 'it came out similar overall to a salicylic acid peel' and stops.
Second, 'no difference' is not 'the same'. Splitting 50 people in two and finding no difference can mean there is none, or that there was not the power to find one.
Third, the split by lesion type is a secondary analysis. The primary endpoint was the overall score, and that tied. The broken-out result is better read as a hypothesis for the next trial.
It is still practical information. It means the answer may differ depending on whether comedones or red angry lesions are the main problem. Read the salicylic acid page alongside.
So this entry is 'not established'.
- Randomised controlled trial in people · 50 participants · 12 weeks · Compared with another active ingredient · Funding not declared · Endpoint scores from blinded assessors PMID 31553119
Adverse effects were fewer with mandelic acid
Same trial, same 50 people.
Adverse effects of both agents were noted at each visit.
Result: they were fewer with the mandelic acid peel. The authors conclude that a 45% mandelic acid peel was as effective as a 30% salicylic acid peel, while its safety and tolerability were better.
Why we grade this differently from the entry above.
Up there, the comparator being another acid blocked the conclusion. Here it is an advantage.
Because the question is not 'does a peel reduce acne' but 'which of the two acids is less unpleasant'. For that question, a randomised head-to-head under the same conditions gives a good answer. We said the same on the erbium laser page — the same trial earns different grades depending on the question.
This result does not contradict the account about mandelic acid's large molecule either. But we will keep the distinction: the account did not produce the result; the result happened to fit the account.
So it sits at 'early evidence'. One trial, 50 people, no further.
And this is a kind of information this site writes down relatively rarely. One of the things people actually ask when choosing an ingredient or a procedure is how much it stings and how much it flakes — a question that is often easier to answer than the one about effect, and usually the one left out of the writing.
- Randomised controlled trial in people · 50 participants · 12 weeks · Compared with another active ingredient · Funding not declared · Endpoint clinical events (cancers, lesion counts) PMID 31553119
How to use it
- The trial used a 45% peel, six times at two-week intervals. That is a clinic concentration, not a home-use one.
- Toners and serums on sale are usually far weaker, and we did not find a randomised trial at those concentrations.
- It is an AHA. Use sunscreen alongside. Sunscreen is one of the items on this site carrying 'strong evidence'.
- Do not layer it with other acids or retinoids on the same day. With retinol and retinaldehyde especially, irritation adds up.
- If comedones are the main problem, salicylic acid did better in the trial above.
- Severe acne is not something to settle in this layer. See a clinician.
Cautions
- Irritation, stinging, redness and flaking are common across AHAs. In the trial above they were fewer with mandelic acid than with salicylic acid.
- It makes skin more sensitive to sunlight. It thins the outer layer, so sun protection has to travel with it.
- Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation can be a problem on darker skin. The trial above did not report on it separately.
- 45% is a clinic concentration. Do not use high concentrations at home.
- We could not find data on use in pregnancy.
- We found no trial with an untreated arm.
With a new ingredient, apply a small amount somewhere inconspicuous, such as the inner arm, for two days first. Stop if it reddens or stings.
Related skin concerns
What this article relies on
- PubMed — 미국 국립의학도서관 문헌 데이터베이스National Library of Medicine · Checked on 2026-09-16