Home
Ingredient Beauty Benefits

Other · Biotin

Biotin: there has never been a clinical trial of it for hair loss

This is swallowed. A 2017 review went through all the pertinent literature and wrote this — no clinical trial has been conducted to investigate the efficacy of biotin supplementation for alopecia of any kind, and there has been no randomised controlled trial of its effect on hair quality and quantity in human subjects. The same paper also ran market analytics, and concluded that the size of the popularity is badly out of line with the size of the evidence.

Last checked Sep 29, 2026

Start here

What it is

A water-soluble B vitamin, also called vitamin B7 or vitamin H.

What it is used for

The most widely sold ingredient in supplements for hair and nails.

How it is said to work

An essential cofactor for enzymes involved in fatty acid and amino acid metabolism.

There are no numbers and no citations in this box. What has been established, and how far, is below.

At a glance

In pregnancy
Not established
Irritation
Minimal
Daytime use
✓ Fine
How well established
Not established
Concentration studied
Not disclosed
Length of the studies
Not disclosed

Not a measurement — reported irritation grouped into five steps. It varies between people.

“Concentration studied” and “Length of the studies” are taken straight from the research on this page. They are not a recommended dose, and the figure for each finding is written out in the text.

This is not how large the effect is but how well confirmed it is. It shows the highest grade among the findings on this page.

Korean classification Being checkedThe regulatory class has not yet been confirmed against a primary document. It will be filled in once it is.

Biotin is a water-soluble B vitamin, also called vitamin B7 or vitamin H. It is an essential cofactor for several carboxylases involved in the metabolism of fatty acids and amino acids and in gluconeogenesis.

There is no efficacy badge on this page. And the reason is exactly the reason this site exists.

In 2017 a review went through all the pertinent literature on biotin supplementation for hair growth and hair quality. The same paper also investigated the ingredient's popularity through market analytics.

Setting those two figures side by side is what the paper did. Its title says so — 'The infatuation with biotin supplementation: is there truth behind its rising popularity? A comparative analysis of clinical efficacy versus social popularity.'

And here is what it found.

  • no clinical trial has been conducted to investigate the efficacy of biotin supplementation for alopecia of any kind
  • nor has there been any randomised controlled trial of its effect on hair quality and quantity in human subjects

This is not 'the evidence is thin'. It is 'there are no trials'. Few ingredient pages on this site carry that sentence.

So why make this page. Biotin is the most widely sold ingredient in supplements for hair and nails. If this site is a place that records the distance between what is sold and what has been established, it cannot leave out the item where that distance is longest.

Where this site does attach thick evidence on hair loss is elsewhere. Minoxidil is one of the few items here carrying 'strong evidence', and PRP and low-level laser therapy have trials attached too. The hair loss page gathers those places together.

Contents
  1. The trials are not thin — there are none

What is established

The same ingredient at a different strength, in a different formula, is a different product. These are the conditions the studies used.

Not establishedConcentration studied — Not established

The trials are not thin — there are none

A 2017 review in J Drugs Dermatol. First, why this entry has no badge.

Grades on this site point at trials we have opened and read ourselves. We attach one when the numbers, the duration, the control and who did the scoring can be checked. For this entry no such trial exists. And since a paper has established that absence, we carry that paper instead of a badge.

The paper did two things.

First, it reviewed all pertinent literature on biotin supplementation for hair growth and hair quality improvement. Here is the result as written.

  • to date, no clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of biotin supplementation for the treatment of alopecia of any kind
  • nor has there been any randomised controlled trial to study its effect on hair quality and quantity in human subjects
  • so it wrote that its use to improve hair quantity or quality is not routinely recommended

Second, the same paper investigated the ingredient's social popularity through market analytics. And put the two side by side.

The concluding sentence is the point of this page — societal infatuation is propagated by its glamorisation in popular media, and its popularity is vastly disproportionate to the insufficient clinical evidence supporting its efficacy. In other words, biotin supplements are quite 'in vogue', without there being any real reason to be so.

Now how to read this.

First, 'there are no trials' is not the same statement as 'it does not work'. This site keeps those apart. Not having been measured and having been measured with no difference found are different things. The endermologie page is the latter; this page is the former.

Second, but they push a decision the same way. Whether to spend money and time in the absence of evidence is yours to decide, and what this site can do is say precisely what that state of affairs is.

Third, this does not mean the body does not need biotin. It is an essential cofactor, and real deficiency does cause hair loss and skin symptoms. But deficiency is rare, and that adding more for someone who is not deficient increases hair is a separate claim. There is no material testing that separate claim.

Fourth, and this ingredient carries one real risk that has nothing to do with trials — it makes blood tests come out wrong. That is under cautions below. It is the most practical information on this page.

So it sits at 'not established'. On this site that badge usually means 'the trials are thin'. Here it means 'there are no trials'.

How to use it

  • There is no basis for writing a dose. With no clinical trial for hair, there is no trial dose for this site to carry across. We do not estimate one.
  • If you are looking at hair loss, start where the evidence is. Minoxidil carries 'strong evidence' here. PRP and low-level laser therapy have trials too.
  • Establish the cause of the hair loss first. Male and female pattern, patchy, traction, and loss driven by systemic illness or a medicine are all different. Start from the hair loss page.
  • If you are due a blood test, say that you are taking it. See cautions below.
  • Trials of topical biotin are not on this page either.

Cautions

  • This is the most important caution on the page — biotin can distort blood test results. Several assays are designed around biotin, and results can come out other than the truth. Thyroid function tests and cardiac markers are the ones most often raised. A misread result means a missed condition, or treatment for one you do not have.
  • So say that you are taking it before a blood test. Supplements often do not get counted as 'medicines' and drop out of the history. Say it first.
  • It is commonly explained that a water-soluble vitamin simply leaves the body in excess, but the test interference above happens regardless of that explanation.
  • Check use in pregnancy or breastfeeding in a clinic.
  • If hair is falling suddenly and heavily, if the scalp is inflamed or scarred, or if it comes out in patches, seek care before picking a supplement. Different causes need different things.

With a new ingredient, apply a small amount somewhere inconspicuous, such as the inner arm, for two days first. Stop if it reddens or stings.

Related skin concerns

What this article relies on

  1. PubMed — 미국 국립의학도서관 문헌 데이터베이스National Library of Medicine · Checked on 2026-09-16