Home
Ingredient Beauty Benefits

Area · Face

Facelift — it lifts the layer under the skin, not the skin

An operation to raise a face that has descended. Pulling skin alone looks unnatural and does not last, so treating the fascial layer beneath it (the SMAS) is the current standard.

Last checked Sep 20, 2026

At a glance

Time in surgery
180–300 min
Anaesthesia
General
Downtime
14–21 days
Until the final shape
6–12 months
Scarring
Where it does not show
Can it be undone
Cannot be undone
Relative cost
Highest

Cost is not an amount but a band among the surgeries on this site. It is measured on a different scale from the cost band on the procedure pages, so the two cannot be compared.

What the operation does

A face does not fall by skin alone. Under the skin is a fascial layer called the SMAS, under that is fat, and ligaments hold it all in place. With age the whole set descends together.

So skin-only lifts are not done now. Pulled skin stretches again, and in the meantime the face just looks pulled. That is largely why old facelifts looked unnatural.

The current approach raises the skin, pulls and fixes the SMAS beneath it, then lays the skin back without tension. The pull is carried by the layer below rather than by skin.

Names vary by extent — from jawline and neck only, up through the midface, to including the forehead and brows.

The incisions follow the hairline and around the ear. Those are inconspicuous places, but it is not the same as having no scar.

What to know

This has among the longest recoveries on this site. You can be out in public at two to three weeks, but the line of the face takes six months to a year to settle.

Sensation changes for a while. Numbness around the ear and cheek is common and usually returns over months, though some can persist.

Rarely, the facial nerve can be injured. The nerves that move expression run just beneath the SMAS. Most such injuries are temporary, but this is the heaviest risk of the operation.

Haematoma is the most common early complication — blood collecting under the lifted area, which has to be drained promptly. High blood pressure and smoking raise the risk.

Scars and the hairline can shift. The incision in front of the ear can widen, and the sideburn can ride up.

If swelling suddenly grows on one side, if pain worsens, or if one side of the face will not move, report it immediately.

What decides the result

Not smoking weighs especially heavily here. Once the skin is lifted it survives on blood flow from its edges. Smoking reduces that flow and sharply raises the risk of the skin dying (skin necrosis). Many places make a period of abstinence a condition.

Lost volume and descent are different problems. If a face looks older because it has hollowed, pulling alone can make it look gaunter. That is why fat grafting or filler is often considered alongside.

This operation does not change skin quality. Pigment, fine lines and texture stay as they are. Those belong to fractional laser and pigment lasers.

Decide in advance whether the neck is included. Lift the face and leave the neck, and the boundary shows.

Sort out blood pressure and current medications beforehand. They bear directly on haematoma risk.

Before you decide

It does not turn the clock back; it sets the clock once. The state at the time of surgery improves, and ageing continues. How long it holds varies with age, skin and how you live.

It cannot be undone. A fixed fascial layer and excised skin do not return.

Non-surgical procedures share the goal but not the scale. Ultherapy, Thermage and thread lifts recover quickly but change less; this is the reverse. They are not substitutes for each other but different steps.

There is usually no reason to hurry the age. Done too early, the odds of repeating it within its own lifespan go up.

Whether to have it done is settled with a doctor, and it is better not to settle it on one consultation alone.

What has been checked about this operation

Moderate evidenceSafety

Complication rates differ by technique — and the authors wrote not to choose on that basis

A meta-analysis pooled complications of SMAS facelift techniques across 183 studies. There were real differences between them.

  • Temporary facial nerve injury — high lateral SMAS 1.85% and composite 1.52% were highest, and the only two significantly above SMAS plication (OR 2.71 and 2.22, P < 0.05)
  • Major haematoma — deep plane 1.22% (OR 1.67, P < 0.05), SMAS imbrication 1.92% (OR 2.65, P < 0.01)
  • Skin necrosis — SMAS flap 1.57% (OR 2.29, P < 0.01)

But the line that matters most is this: the risk of permanent nerve injury did not differ between techniques.

Hence the authors' conclusion. Choose the technique on the quality of the result, not on the complication profile. The differences above fell mostly among temporary events, and did not separate on the injuries that do not come back.

These are pooled observational studies, so which patient received which technique may have been skewed from the start. A harder face invites a deeper dissection, and the complications follow it there. Sample size was not reported.

  • Observational study in people (183) · sample size not reported · Compared with another technique · Funding not declared · Endpoint clinical events (cancers, lesion counts) PMID 30768122 · abstract read
Not establishedEffect

That deep plane is better is not established by this data

The term heard most often now is deep plane. A pooled analysis of 21 studies and 2,896 patients has the numbers.

  • Deep plane — satisfaction 94.4% (95% CI 84.8–99.7), complications 17.2%
  • SMAS — satisfaction 87.8% (95% CI 84.3–91.3), complications 10.3% (95% CI 6.20–14.4)

Those two lines must not be read as a head-to-head result. This is a one-arm meta-analysis — the techniques were not compared within the same studies; each was pooled separately and set side by side. Different patients, different surgeons, different standards.

The numbers do not separate them either. The confidence intervals overlap heavily — the lower bound for deep plane (84.8) sits inside the SMAS interval.

And the complication rate was higher for deep plane (17.2% versus 10.3%).

The authors' own conclusion is not that deep plane is better but that both give robust, long-lasting results. The journal rated the level of evidence II.

Satisfaction here was self-reported and not measured with a validated instrument.

  • Observational study in people (21) · 2,896 participants · Compared with no control group (before-and-after only) · Funding not declared · Endpoint self-reported improvement PMID 40801931 · abstract read

Where this operation sits

The concern it belongs to

Other operations in the same slot

Options that are not surgery

Used for the same concern but not surgical. These do carry evidence grades.

Skin concerns this operation touches

Whether to have it done is a decision to make with a doctor.